Subject: Proposed revisions to align minority member protections in the Operating Agreement
Hi all,
Thank you for circulating the draft Operating Agreement for Redwood Controlled Growth LLC. I am supportive of moving the company forward, but after reviewing the current draft from the perspective of an Investor Member, I have several concerns that I think should be addressed so the agreement reflects a more balanced long-term governance and economic framework.
The main issues for me are:
1. Capital calls and default remedies. The current draft allows mandatory capital calls at any time for any purpose, with funding due in 10 business days, and imposes very punitive consequences for any shortfall, including 2x dilution, suspension of voting rights, and a 15% priority member loan. I would like capital calls to be limited to approved budgets or true emergencies, with a longer funding period and more proportionate remedies.
2. Distributions and tax protection. Distributions are entirely discretionary, and the agreement expressly states that tax distributions are not required even if members receive taxable K-1 allocations without cash. I would like a mandatory tax distribution provision and a more objective available-cash distribution standard.
3. Minority approval rights on major actions. The Manager currently has exclusive authority over essentially all ordinary and extraordinary matters, and Investor Members have no separate approval rights for additional unit issuances, affiliate transactions, borrowing, sale of substantially all assets, or changes to the business plan. I am requesting a defined list of major actions that require approval of the Investor Members as a separate class.
4. Information rights. The draft only provides annual tax information and otherwise denies inspection rights unless the Manager approves. If Investor Members are expected to fund capital calls and bear pass-through tax liabilities, they should receive at least quarterly financial statements, annual budgets, tax returns, and reasonable inspection rights.
5. Transfer and liquidity. The current transfer restrictions effectively lock Investor Members in indefinitely, with no permitted estate-planning transfers, no tag-along rights, and no practical exit path. I would like customary permitted transfers, tag-along rights for founder sales, and a reasonable withdrawal or liquidity mechanism.
6. Buy-sell valuation and payout terms. The current call-option structure is especially difficult for an Investor Member because it uses book value, then applies both a 25% minority discount and a 25% marketability discount, with payment over 5 years on an unsecured 2% note. I would like involuntary buyouts to be based on fair value determined by an independent appraiser, without minority or marketability discounts, and with materially stronger payment terms.
7. Fiduciary duties and affiliate transactions. The draft eliminates fiduciary duties to the maximum extent permitted by law and allows competition, opportunity-taking, and affiliate transactions without Investor Member approval. At a minimum, I would like conflict transactions to be subject to disclosure, arm's-length standards, and approval by disinterested Investor Members or an independent decision-maker.
8. Restrictive covenants. The 3-year nationwide non-compete applies to every Member, including passive investors, and is broader than I can accept in its current form. I would like that narrowed substantially or limited to active service providers.
I think these points can be addressed in a practical way without disrupting the overall structure of the deal. My goal is not to interfere with day-to-day management, but to ensure that Investor Members are protected against coercive dilution, phantom-income exposure, conflicted transactions, and below-market forced exits.
If helpful, I can mark up the draft with specific language on:
- mandatory tax distributions,
- investor protective votes on major actions,
- preemptive rights,
- quarterly reporting and inspection rights,
- tag-along rights,
- fair-value appraisal mechanics, and
- more balanced capital-call default remedies.
I would appreciate the chance to discuss these revisions before the agreement is finalized.
Best,
Member
Cap Table AI Analysis